Editorial Cartoon of the Day: December 7, 2012

Editorial Cartoon of the Day: December 3, 2012

GOP Has to Reach Out to Hispanics and Other to Survive

Photo courtesy of Donkey Hotey / Flickr

Forget Republican comebacks in 2014 or 2016.

Unless it gets its head and its heart straight, the party might never win the popular vote or the White House again.

The GOP today is not my father’s party.

And until the hierarchy of the GOP stops talking about how great Ronald Reagan was and starts embracing what he really stood for, the party of conservatism is destined for the ash heap of history.

Ronald Reagan was somebody who believed in inclusion, not exclusion. He found a way to reach out to all voting groups, which is why he was the last Republican presidential candidate to win the Hispanic vote.

The GOP in 2012 reminds me of the state of disarray it was in during the mid-1960s.

It was so bad for Republicans in California then that they held a special convention and invited the state’s Democratic Speaker of the Assembly, Jesse Unruh, to come and tell them what was wrong with them.

Unruh came and was blunt: The GOP had no vision and no message for voters, because they didn’t know who they were or what they stood for.

Those pre-Ronald Reagan Republicans got the message. They left that convention, turned their fortunes around, and ended up with Ronald Reagan in the governor’s chair.

Today’s national GOP needs the same kind of turnaround, and the process starts with fixing the party’s inclusion problem with Hispanic, black and Asian voters.

Last week I spoke to a room of 400 conservatives. The only blacks in the room were serving us breakfast. There were only a couple Hispanics — in Florida.

That’s not inclusive. Republicans have got to find a way to reach out to these communities.

I told those conservatives in Florida a story about a young man who as a child came to the United States illegally with his parents in the early 1980s.

He became an American citizen in 1986 when my father signed into law the Simpson-Mazzoli Act, which granted amnesty to 3 million illegal residents and made them citizens.

When he turned 18, to thank the United Stares for allowing him to become a citizen, he joined the Navy to serve his new country.

When the USS Ronald Reagan was home porting in San Diego, he volunteered to serve on the ship named after the president who allowed him to become a citizen. Now he mentors 275 sailors on that aircraft carrier and is working on his master’s degree.

There are a thousand stories like that that nobody wants to tell when Republicans talk about immigration.

The GOP has got to find a message of inclusion instead of “Get the hell out of my country.” That’s what Hispanics and other immigrants hear from the Republican Party — “Get out.”

We have to attract immigrants to the GOP, not repel them. We have to do it with more than words every two or four years. And we can’t do what Mitt Romney did.

He came to California, held a fundraiser, grabbed his money and left. He did nothing to get out the vote or reach out to the Hispanic community.

Romney wasn’t going to carry California. But we lost three good incumbents in close congressional races in the state on Nov. 6 — Mary Bono Mack, Dan Lundgren and Brian Bilbray.

Why did we lose those seats? Because only 29 percent of registered voters in California are Republican. And why is that? Because the GOP lacks a vision. Because it lacks a message.

If the GOP is to survive and get this country back on track, it has to regain its Reaganesque vision and make its message more caring and welcoming to immigrants.

The Republican Party has to reach out to the Hispanic, black, Asian and other communities and become involved with them — and do it every day from now on.

Until that happens, the GOP is going to have lots more Thanksgivings with less and less to give thanks for.

Photo courtesy of the gifted and talented Donkey Hotey.

Enhanced by Zemanta

One Way the GOP Can “Stop Being the Stupid Party”

Photo courtesy of Gage Skidmore

If there is still a rule of social decorum that requires one to pause for a seemly period after a man’s death before courting his widow, Bobby Jindal just broke it.

In statements he made this week, Jindal, the Republican governor of Louisiana and current chair of the Republican Governors Association, repudiated Mitt Romney and made a bid to lead a new Republican party.

Romney, as everyone now knows, said in a conference call with his big donors that Obama won the election by giving “gifts” to “especially the African-American community, the Hispanic community and young people.”

Jindal pounced.

“I absolutely reject that notion,” he said. “We have got to stop dividing the American voters … We need to continue to show how our policies can help every voter out there achieve the American Dream.”

Earlier in the week, Jindal said that Republicans have to “stop being the stupid party.”

“We’ve got to make sure that we are not the party of big business, big banks, big Wall Street bailouts, big corporate loopholes, big anything. We cannot be, we must not be, the party that simply protects the rich so they get to keep their toys.”

The Republican Party has a chance right now to start moving in the direction Jindal wants. Obama met with Republican and Democratic leaders at the White House Friday to begin negotiating a deficit reduction package that Congress must pass by the end of the year to avoid the “fiscal cliff.”

Obama wants to keep tax rates the same for 98 percent of Americans and increase the top marginal tax rate for the highest earners from 35 percent to 39.6 percent, where it was during the Clinton years.

If the Republicans want to start to shed the image of the rich man’s party, they should make sure the Obama tax hike passes.

A few days after the election, Republican pollster Frank Luntz appeared on Fox News and shared the results of a survey that asked voters what groups the Republicans were most interested in helping. The answers looked like this:

REPUBLICANS MOST INTERESTED IN HELPING

—The Wealthy 50 percent

—Big Business 48 percent

—Hardworking Taxpayers 26 percent

—The Middle Class 23 percent

—Small Business 18 percent

—Special Interests 17 percent

—Families 16 percent

—The Poor 3 percent

Republicans will reinforce this image in an unforgettable way if they cling to a historically low tax rate for the rich when the deficit has never been higher and the rich have never been richer.

Bill Kristol, conservative commentator and editor of the Weekly Standard, put it this way: “Really? The Republican Party is going to fall on its sword to defend a bunch of millionaires, half of whom voted Democratic and half of whom live in Hollywood and are hostile to Republican principles?”

We will hear Republican hardliners stick to the argument that a tax hike on the rich will hurt everyone. But it’s easier to find evidence against that view than for it.

In 1993, the last time Congress voted for a personal income tax rate hike, Republicans called the bill “job-killing poison,” and no Republican voted for it. Following the tax hike — which affected only top earners — the country experienced the longest economic expansion in history with more than 22 million new jobs, higher incomes at all levels, the lowest unemployment rate in 40 years, the lowest poverty rate in 20 years and a steep drop in child poverty.

In September of this year, the Congressional Research Service published an economic analysis of the top tax rates since World War II, which includes the 91 percent top marginal tax rate in place in the 1940s and 1950s. The report found no clear correlation between reducing top tax rates and increased saving, investment or productivity growth.

In his farewell address in January of 1960, President Eisenhower (who once called tax cuts “fiscal recklessness … that would lead to a vast wasteland of debt and financial chaos”) warned the country against the “recurring temptation to feel that some spectacular and costly action could become the miraculous solution to all current difficulties.”

The Republican Party came to see tax cuts as that miraculous solution. Today, however, it seems that a few Republicans may be willing to go along with the opinion that tax cuts can be good in some cases, and not so good in others. We’ll find out soon.

That would not be a small thing. It could be a big thing. It could be, perhaps, the beginning of a shift from ideology back to pragmatism.

Enhanced by Zemanta

In Other News: Post-Election Edition

Oak Ridge defensive back Germod Williams makes the news for his athletic talents, but it's the As and Bs that he makes in school that will take him far. Photo courtesy of Jim Eastin.

Lots of stuff happens every day in our community, and we don’t have the staff to cover everything. And sometimes we don’t even hear about it here at Oak Ridge Now until we read it somewhere else. But you might not have heard about it either, so we once again bring you another edition of In Other News.

I am positive – absolutely positive – that everyone is happy that election season is behind us. We live in a conservative, Republican-dominated community, and last week nobody running against a GOP candidate received more than 22% of the vote in Montgomery County (congratulations to you, Bryan Cambrice, candidate for County Commissioner Precinct 3, for garnering the most votes, percentage-wise for the Democrats).

School Board elections, however, are non-partisan, and the race for Conroe ISD Trustee Position 7 was a bit closer. Former Oak Ridge High School teacher Jessica Powell prevailed over incumbent Joe Michels, beating him by over 8,000 votes 59% to 41%.

Mrs. Powell currently works as an instructional technology specialist for Huntsville ISD. Mr. Michels, the former mayor of Oak Ridge North, was originally appointed to the seat in July, 2011, following the retirement of Gerald Irons, Sr.

Oak Ridge North is moving forward with it’s sewer and water pipe rehab project. We all anxiously await the day when the construction is complete on Robinson Road.

Living Magazine ran a nice article on the War Eagle Band in preparation for the trip to the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade. Somehow they forgot to mention Oak Ridge High School band director Jack Allen, but hey, anytime we get recognized in a glossy magazine, we shouldn’t complain.

There was a lot to glean from the ORHS Aerial View newspaper this past week. The War Eagle swim and dive team hosted their third annual Breast Stroke for Breast Cancer Swim-a-thon last Friday, in hopes of reaching this year’s goal of raising $7,000 to fight breast cancer. Over the past two years this event has raised $11,000. Wow.

The Aerial View also had features on four standout students:

  • Senior defensive back Germod Williams, who is sorting out offers from various universities, including Rice and Northwestern. That’s what happens when you excel at both football and academics.
  • Freshman QB Braden Letney, who made a huge leap from the freshman team to quarterbacking the varsity team in a competitive 5A district. And did it really well.
  • Junior Nathan England who, as part of an Eagle scout project,  raised $6,000 this summer selling sausage in front of Wal Mart and Home Depot, and used the money to buy the materials to build a gazebo for Bridgewood Farms. He then spent the rest of the summer building the gazebo. Outfreakingstanding.
  • Makenna Spencer, Senior class president, Colonel on the Liberty Belles, National Honor Society member, National Dance Solo champion, Homecoming Queen, and devoted Christian. If you told me she was working on a cure for the common cold and has a plan to solve the European debt crisis, I would believe you.

Finally, Impactnews takes a look at Compadres Texas Cafe, in the same building as Simon’s Barber Shop on Hanna Road, and its menu of vintage Tex-Mex selections. We recommend the chicken-fried anything.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Last Week, In Case You Missed It: November 11, 2012

Well, this certainly was a big week, what with the presidential election and all. There was all the last minute election build-up, election night itself with all of the projection drama, and of course, the post-election analysis. I also heard a story on NPR this afternoon previewing the 2016 presidential election candidates. Oh, joy.

While President Obama, Texas Republicans, and the GLBT and 420 communities all had good nights, the biggest winner this week has to be Nate Silver, who writes the celebrated and derided FiveThirtyEight blog in the New York Times. Silver correctly predicted the presidential outcomes in all 50 states, based upon the available polling data, historical voting information, and his own secret sauce. It was an improvement over 2008, when he correctly predicted only 49 of 50 states. As someone wrote this week, “If Nate Silver predicts there’s a 90% chance that it will be raining marshmallows tomorrow, I’m running outside with a cup of hot chocolate.” Nate’s new book, The Signal and the Noise, is moving up the New York Times Bestsellers List, and is also #1 on my Christmas wish list.

In the days leading up to this year’s election, we looked at how we vote for judges in Texas (i.e. Republican: good, anything else: bad). Even controversial judges like Sharon Keller have nothing to fear right now, so long as they have the (R) next to their name. We had a pretty good idea that Ted Cruz would cruise to a win in the Texas Senate race against Paul Sadler, but Tom Rosshirt thought the the GOP nationwide would probably have to make some policy adjustments should Mitt Romney lose (he did, and they will).

We looked at seven things that could go wrong during the election. One definitely came true: Florida was still counting ballots on Saturday. I’m thinking Florida should conduct voting for the 2016 election next week, just to ensure they’ll have everything counted in time. Finally, we all know that the election would have a tremendous effect on healthcare moving forward, and we provided a list of the specifics. We also presented seven factors that will continue to drive up the cost of health care. Number two: we’re growing older, sicker and fatter. Don’t matter who is elected president – that one is unlikely to change soon.

After the election, we pointed out that even though President Obama gets four more years in the White House, much of health care reform still depends upon the actions of states like Texas. Besides health care reform measures, Texas legislators have a lot to tackle in the upcoming legislative session. One thing that is unlikely to gain much attention in Austin: legalizing marijuana, even if it were a potential new source of revenue for the state.

As we mentioned before, Texas Republicans had a good election day, as expected. Of course, Ted Cruz won his U.S. Senate race, but Republicans up and down the ballot easily won their races. In Montgomery County, they often ran unopposed, as few Democrats want to waste the time, money, and energy on an highly unlikely chance at winning an election.

Our post-election analysis include Bill O’Reilly’s personal note to President Obama. Tom Rosshirt watches the election night speeches, and has some suggestions for what they might have added. For President Obama, he suggested:

“I want to say a few words right now — not to the people here in this room or to my campaign team here in Chicago or to my supporters across the country. I want to speak instead to the millions of Americans who voted for Gov. Romney and who are disappointed, even discouraged, to see me at this podium tonight in front of happy supporters — if you can even bear to watch.

“You hoped to see at this hour on election night the smiling faces of Gov. Romney and his team, and many of you believe that our chances for building a better country have been lost — at least for now.

“Campaigns are long, difficult, passionate quests. They fire the energy and idealism of a wide range of people and then leave many good and proud citizens discouraged for the future. In a close election, the results can leave nearly half the nation dispirited. In a large nation such as ours, that means nearly 60 million people. We cannot ultimately have a strong nation if 60 million vibrant, involved citizens feel discouraged or disenfranchised.

“I want to recognize your wishes, your hard work, your love of country and your doubts about me. I want to acknowledge your principles and your ideals. I promise you tonight that I will listen to you and to the representatives you have sent today to Washington with the deepest respect. I will do all I can within the constraints of my duties to answer your needs and meet your concerns for our country.

“I know that I am not the president that you wanted, but I am determined to be a better president than you expected.”

Obviously, Tom Rosshirt used to be a speechwriter. Peter Funt also took in the speeches, but worries that well just end up with the status quo for the next four years.

The election may be over, but we still have a whole lot of troops in Afghanistan. The national discussion about those troops will probably drop off (better to focus on David Petraeus’ domestic issues). That’s why we feature stories about the unknown soldiers in Oak Ridge Now. President Obama said today in his Veterans Day remarks,

“On behalf of the American people, I say to you that the memory of your loved one carries on not just in your hearts, but in ours as well.  And I assure you that their sacrifice will never be forgotten,” he said. “For it is in that sacrifice that we see the enduring spirit of America.  Since even before our founding, we have been blessed with an unbroken chain of patriots who have always come forward to serve.”

We did carry some non-election news this week – it comes as no surprise that Texas power rates are probably going to rise. Of course, no one can venture a guess as to how much. I’m not optimistic, though, and I just locked in a two-year contract to keep my rate at the house steady.

And for those of you who think President Obama might be soft on crime, the President has granted clemency at a lower rate than any modern president. In the past four years he has pardoned 22 individuals, while declining 1,019 requests, for roughly a 1 in 50 rate. Compare that to George W. Bush (1 in 33), Bill Clinton (1 in 8), George H.W. Bush (1 in 16), and Ronald Reagan (1 in 3).

The cleanup of Hurricane Sandy (or Superstorm Sandy, depending on your news source of choice) is still ongoing, creating much wringing of hands and gnashing of teeth. Two weeks without power? Yeah, been there, done that. Personally, I’d rather have no heat in New York than no air conditioning in Texas, but that’s just me. So did global warming make the storm worse? We take a look at the scientific reasoning behind that. John Stossel complains about FEMA’s involvement in the whole mess, preferring to leave the cleanup to the private insurance folks. And Bill O’Reilly agrees, saying, “Life is hard, and then you die. But while you’re alive, you’ll be far better off if you forget about the big-government nonsense, deemphasize the machines and begin incorporating the discipline of self-reliance into your life.” Truth.

Enough of the national and Texas news already. On the local level, we recapped the season-ending War Eagle loss to the Highlanders. Football season is over, and we’re all going to miss it. We also took a look back at the bizarre Oak Ridge – Lufkin game that was called less than a minute into the second quarter due to an ill-timed storm. There’s no way, no way they could have made any other decision.

I would hope that most folks know by now that the War Eagle Marching Band will be performing in the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade in less than two weeks. They are also raising funds to benefit the victims of Superstorm Sandy. We are already proud of them. This is just icing on the cake.

Our regular feature included Kurt Loder reviewing Skyfall, the new James Bond flick, and Man With the Iron Fists, the Chinese Kung Fu homage from RZA. In Fashion, Sharon Mosley encourage ladies to forget the little black dress this holiday season, and dress like the women from Downtown Abbey. Really. And Mark Maynard takes a look at the new EyeSight driver assist feature in the 2013 Subaru Legacy. The package integrates adaptive cruise control, pre-collision braking and lane-departure and sway control warnings. Very cool.

Finally, we brought a little bit of the funny to you this week. Katiedid Langrock got to take her new baby trick-or-treating this year and Nick Thomas asks (and answers) the classic question: Why did the chicken cross the road? Among my favorites:

Dr. Phil: The issue is not why the chicken is crossing, by why we’re enabling it to engage in risky activities.

The United Nations: We will send a team of poultry inspectors to the road site in question and determine if a crossing is viable.  Then we will form a committee to determine if the chicken crossing should be internationally sanctioned. This may take 2 or 3 years at which time we will make an unenforceable recommendation.

All that and our terrific editorial cartoons, last week in Oak Ridge Now.

Instant Weekly Roundup - Free WordPress Plugin
Enhanced by Zemanta

Against the Grain, Texas GOP Dominated on Election Day

Photo courtesy of Gage Skidmore

Democratic victories across the nation left Republican voters and activists with the political version of a hangover last week. In the alternate universe known as Texas, they are blaming the Champagne.

Republicans here are celebrating another statewide sweep. They held onto huge majorities in the Legislature and the Texas congressional delegation. And at a time of increasing angst about their ability to thrive as the Hispanic population grows, the Texas Republican Party has fielded the first Hispanic U.S. senator from Texas — Ted Cruz.

“Thank God for Texas,” Chris Turner, a Republican consultant, said in a post-election speech to Republican activists in a conservative suburb of Austin. He said, joking, that the state might consider using stimulus money “to build a moat around our northern border.”

Nationwide, conservatives watched as Democrats scored come-from-behind victories in some red-state U.S. Senate contests and thinned out the Republican Party’s majority in the U.S. House. Victories by gay rights proponents and supporters of legalized pot did nothing to lift their spirits.

They could take solace, though, in the nation’s second-largest state, where full-throated conservative Rick Perry has been governor for a dozen years and no one is betting he will be replaced by a Democrat anytime soon. Perry was not on the ballot this year, so the big question on Election Day was the margin of victory in Texas for the men at the top of the ticket, Mitt Romney and Cruz. It turned out to be about 57 percent each.

Texas is the only majority-minority state that is reliably Republican, and it has gone longer without a Democrat in statewide office than any other state, according to PolitiFact Texas.

“We are the tomato in the blue sea,” said Peggy Venable, a conservative activist and director of the Texas branch of Americans for Prosperity. “We truly are different. I had people across the country that called me last night saying, ‘I’m moving to Texas.’”

There are some caveats to the victory narrative. Just as Republicans had some bright spots nationally, Democrats in Texas are crowing about a handful of electoral successes here.

In the state’s only congressional swing district, state Rep. Pete Gallego, D-Alpine, was declared the winner against U.S. Rep. Francisco “Quico” Canseco, R-San Antonio, though Canseco has not conceded. State Sen. Wendy Davis, D-Fort Worth, whose defeat would have brought Republicans one vote shy of an unbreakable two-thirds majority in that chamber, hung on in a district drawn to elect a Republican. And, with an influx of minority voters over the last decade, there will be more Democrats in the Legislature as a result of a redistricting process.

Scattered among the state’s election results are some warning signs for Republicans looking at a future that might not be as accommodating to their policy prescriptions and sometimes harsh rhetoric on hot-button social issues.

At the top of the ticket, Democrats were either tied with or dominating Republicans in four of the five largest counties, forcing Republicans to count on ever-larger margins in predominately white suburban and rural areas to stay on top.

Democrats, meanwhile, picked off three Republican incumbents in legislative races, but none of their own lost re-election contests. Three Republican incumbents also lost races — to little-known Democrats with Hispanic surnames — for seats on the 4th Court of Appeals in heavily Hispanic South Texas.

In a state where Hispanics make up 38 percent of the population — and about half of the non-adults — results like that worry some Republicans.

“This election cycle was a preview of what’s coming and what is here already in some areas of the state of Texas,” said state Rep. Aaron Peña, R-Edinburg, who did not seek re-election. “If Republicans don’t adapt to the changing demographics, then they will die.’’ He said with the rapidly changing population and political environment, that could happen sooner rather than later.

Anthony Holm, a Republican consultant in Texas, said a hard-line stance on immigration in particular has hurt Republican efforts to woo Hispanics, who tend to be socially conservative and pro-business.

“If we took that off the table, we would get a lot of their votes,” Holm said. “We have to find a way to get immigration resolved that we can live with.”

The drift toward more strident debates over illegal immigration is a relatively recent phenomenon in Texas. Republican leaders, including former President George W. Bush, traditionally stood apart from their national counterparts on the issue, using a softer approach favored by businesses that are dependent on migrant labor.

As president, Bush sought a guest-worker program that ultimately failed because of opposition from fellow Republicans. A decade later, during the 2012 Republican presidential race, Perry, his successor as Texas governor, famously stood by his support for a 2001 law that gives young illegal immigrants in-state college tuition rates. But Romney pounded him for it, and Perry paid a hefty price during the primary season.

Both Perry and Cruz, now senator-elect, have harshly criticized President Obama’s executive order allowing the same type of young immigrants — those who were brought here illegally by their parents but have stayed out of trouble — to get two-year work visas.  Cruz called the order “lawless” and said during the campaign he wanted a President Romney to overturn it.

Texas was not among the states where a news media consortium conducted exit polls, so how much Hispanic support there was for Cruz in his Senate race remains an open question. A review of the returns from several overwhelmingly Hispanic border counties in South Texas suggest he slightly outperformed Romney.

In Webb County, which includes Laredo, Romney got 22 percent of the vote, compared with 31 percent for Cruz; the presidential nominee got 30 percent of the vote in El Paso County, while Cruz won 36 percent.

While Romney and Cruz got lopsided support from white voters, as the presidential ticket did nationally, pre-election surveys by Mike Baselice suggest Romney did 12 to 15 percentage points better with Hispanics in Texas than in California. Obama’s big share of the Latino vote in California more closely mirrors his performance in battleground states.

After comparing surveys from California and Texas, Baselice also said Hispanics self-identify as moderate and conservative at significantly higher rates in Texas. In California, 37 percent of Hispanics call themselves conservative, 30 percent say they’re moderate and 33 percent embrace the liberal label.

In Texas, 46 percent of Hispanics say they are conservative, 36 percent are moderate and 18 percent say they are liberal, Baselice said.

For Democrats, the day when Hispanics vote in high enough numbers to help put them back into statewide competition cannot come soon enough. Richard Morrison, a Democrat, barely won his re-election as a Fort Bend county commissioner — over a Republican abandoned by his own county party after records showed he had voted in both Texas and Pennsylvania three times, an alleged felony.

“Someone is going to have to come down here and invest significant money on turning out the Latino population. It’s going to take about $25 million,’’ Morrison said. “Until they do that we’re just going to be in the same spot.’’

Texas Tribune donors or members may be quoted or mentioned in our stories, or may be the subject of them. For a complete list of contributors, click here.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at http://www.texastribune.org/texas-politics/2012-elections/against-grain-tx-gop-dominated-election-day/.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Leading A Republican Reformation

Photo courtesy of Donkey Hotey

Assuming that the coin tossed into the air Tuesday does not land on its side, just a few days from now Mitt Romney and Barack Obama will make their final speeches of the campaign.

One candidate will be jubilant. The other will have to force the phoniest smile of his life. He’ll read from a prepared text he barely has seen and didn’t prepare that doesn’t convey how he feels. And he’ll spend the next several months in a state of depression, a scapegoat for many in his party and on his side who are angry, frustrated and eager to blame.

The grief on the losing side will be especially acute because the race is so close. Each team is going into Election Day expecting to win — and the expectation of winning is a poor defense against the shock of losing.

If Romney were to lose, his fellow Republicans would erupt in recriminations, spiked by the fact that they never really liked him anyway. He’d be ridiculed by his supporters for not winning in the worst economy since the 1930s. They’d complain that he was too stiff and awkward, that he couldn’t bond with people, that he blundered by not releasing his tax returns and divesting from Bain long ago, and that he ran too far to the right in the primaries, which doomed him in the general election to be either a flip-flopper or a right-winger.

But I hope that if Romney loses, a group of Republican elders will gather to think more constructively about the state of their party.

Today’s Republican Party is not one that seeks to “promote the general welfare” in line with the principles of limited government. Instead, it has become a party whose core principle is to advance the interests of rich people and corporations. In essence, Republicans are seeking minority rule.

Minority rule, of course, is what democracy was designed to prevent, so achieving it requires strange contortions and manipulations of laws and public opinion, including:

—Passing voter ID laws designed to minimize the influence of poor and minority voters.

—Exploiting court rulings and campaign finance laws that maximize the influence of corporations.

—Suppressing scientific evidence, most obviously in the case of climate change, to protect corporate interests in the energy sector.

—Promoting economic ideology that favors the rich. (A Congressional Research Service report recently found that reducing top tax rates does not help grow the economy or create jobs. Republicans in Congress protested, and the study was withdrawn.)

—Appealing to anti-immigrant sentiment and other polarizing views (the birther movement) to attract voters whose economic interests are not served by a pro-corporate agenda.

Those are signs of a party that has come to the end of an honest strategy.

If the Republican Party does not confront its lagging appeal to women and young people and gays and African-Americans and Hispanics and other expanding demographics in the country today, then the games it will be forced to play to try to win a majority of the votes while serving a minority of the voters will become even more bizarre and destructive, not just to the party but also to the country.

That is why I’m hoping that a group of party elders will gather and lead a Republican reformation (Tom Friedman’s term). I would nominate leaders such as outgoing Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and Sen. John McCain of Arizona. That makes three Republican governors — one from a red state, one from a blue state, one from a swing state — and the party’s 2008 presidential nominee. All four have bucked aspects of their party’s most destructive orthodoxies. Jeb Bush has shown he’s not remotely intimidated by Grover Norquist, and — as someone who’s been married for nearly 40 years to a Mexican-American woman — Bush could help heal the rift between Republicans and Hispanics. Mitch Daniels is a pragmatic budget expert who has spoken eloquently against the harsh rhetoric that adds emotion and that strips reason from politics. Chris Christie is the most audaciously blunt man in American politics today and brilliantly countered the anti-Muslim prejudice that confronted one of his state court nominees. And John McCain, still the maverick, has been brutalized for his fierce honesty about the corrupting effect of corporate money in politics.

Those four may have the stature to begin turning things around.

But only if Romney loses.

If Romney were to win the White House on Tuesday, deep reflection would go into the deep freeze. Republicans would not bother to correct any of the things that they would have blamed for their defeat if they had lost — because no matter how serious the flaws are, as long as they aren’t fatal, they don’t matter. In politics, the only unforgivable flaw is losing.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Poll Denial: 50 Shades of Crazy

Photo courtesy of iStockphoto

In 2004, Democrats were so out-of-their-minds angry with George W. Bush that we could not believe polls that showed our guy losing. It couldn’t be that Bush was running a better campaign or that we didn’t give two rips about John Kerry. The polls had to be wrong.

Media Matters attacked Gallup and CBS/New York Times polls in September 2004 as “skewed,” and MoveOn.org took out a full-page ad in the Times criticizing Gallup’s “flawed methodology.”

“This is more than a numbers game,” stated MoveOn. “Poll results profoundly affect a campaign’s news coverage as well as the public’s perception of the candidates.”

Now the poop’s on the other boot. Mitt Romney‘s gaffes keep pumping air under Barack Obama’s convention bounce, and Republicans say that the same polls that liberals complained about in 2004 are, you guessed it, “skewed.” A website called UnskewedPolls.com changes turnout projections to remove what it sees as an over-sampling of Democrats. Not surprisingly, if you take out a lot of Democrats, Romney is winning.

So why would Gallup, CBS and The New York Times skew their polls?

“They want you thinking your side’s lost,” said Rush Limbaugh. “They want you thinking it’s over for what you believe. And that makes you stay home and not vote. That’s what they’re hoping.”

You can read all about it in “Fifty Shades of Crazy.”

As a Democratic consultant, I spend a good chunk of my week on conference calls with campaigns from Alaska to Florida, and a lot of what we talk about is poll results. Over the years, I have easily been on hundreds of these conference calls, and if I had a quarter for every time we “skewed” a turnout model to improve poll numbers I wouldn’t have enough money to buy a newspaper.

“Believing that some perceived liberal media bias has made its way into the polling industry, where reputations and paychecks rely on accuracy, shows a stunning disconnect from reality,” said Democratic pollster Bryan Dooley.

Here’s how it really works. Polls control for age, race, gender and geography. If you know that roughly 52% of voters are women, but only 49% of your poll respondents are women, you give more weight to their answers to balance it out. This is called “weighting” a poll, and it’s what you hear conservative critics claim liberals are forcing the media to do with party self-identification in order to deflate Republican turnout.

But party self-identification is not like age, race, gender or geography in that it can change for an individual during a campaign. I’ve seen how party self-identification on a poll rises and falls like a water level as public opinion changes while age, race, gender, and geography remain constant. In 2008, the wave broke my way. In 2010, a red tide wiped out a lot of my congressional clients. This year, every poll I’ve seen has shown an uptick in people identifying themselves as Democrats since the conventions.

This is the giant zit on the Republicans’ bald-faced lie. Saying you should “control” for party self-identification is just as invalid as changing a poll because you think there should be more people supporting Mitt Romney, said Stefan Hankin, a DC-based pollster. UnskewedPolls.com is “weighting something that changes on a week to week basis which you never want to do,” said Hankin. “Look, just because you want something to be true and you can come up with some ridiculous justification does not make it real.”

The news could be even worse for Republicans, says Democratic pollster Zac McCrary. “The polling produced by reputable pollsters is being conducted using the same core methodologies used in 2004 or 2010 when the polling data would have largely foreshadowed Republican success,” said McCrary. “The real concern for Republicans shouldn’t be that polls are overstating Democrats but that polling may be undercounting Democrats because of the difficulty of reaching cell-phone only voters who are disproportionately more Democratic than land-line voters.”

The simple fact is that Democrats don’t need to conspire with the media to make Republicans look bad. Romney does that all by himself when he opens his mouth and Mitt happens.

Enhanced by Zemanta

In the Fight Against Voter Fraud, the GOP Finds Little

Maybe someday, the Republicans howling about voter fraud will come clean and acknowledge what is really going on: It’s a Republican fraud — one designed to discourage Democratic voters from exercising the franchise.

There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud. None.

Yet around the country, Republicans have pushed for heavy-handed measures to combat it.

Voter ID seems like a simple matter to most people. Who doesn’t have a photo ID? But in poor communities, it’s more common than you might think. If challenged, a voter should be able to prove where he or she lives. But a standard issue ID isn’t necessary for that.

And here’s the thing: Illegal voting is extremely rare. The Associated Press reports that, try as they might, Republican officials in battleground states have turned up only a few illegal voters. The AP says that searches by Republicans in Colorado and Florida have found less than one-tenth of 1 percent of all registered voters in either state were illegal.

Nonetheless, Republican officials in Wisconsin (notably Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen) and elsewhere are using the issue to make political hay. In Colorado, for example, the secretary of state claims there are “real vulnerabilities in the system.”

Yet his earlier estimates of 11,805 noncitizens on the rolls have shrunk to a mere 141. Of those 141, only 35 have ever voted. And according to the Denver clerk and recorder’s office, which did its own checks, the number might be even smaller than that.

Between 12 and 20 people a year are convicted of voter fraud in Wisconsin, reports Reid Magney, a spokesman for Wisconsin’s Government Accountability Board. The state has 3.4 million registered voters. And many of those convictions are of felons who voted before they regained the right to do so. Voter ID doesn’t fix that problem.

That’s some crisis.

In the long run, Republicans would be better off building their party’s base by emphasizing common-sense conservative ideas that have broader appeal. But the party has drifted so far to the right on so many issues that coming back to reality is difficult. It’s enforcement-only immigration policy is but one example of this political pathology. The GOP has alienated an entire generation of Hispanic voters.

The remedy for “voter fraud” is far worse than the feared disease. This country should not be making it harder to vote when we get excited if even half of eligible voters bother to show up at the polls.

But threatened by unfavorable demographics, the GOP is motivated to try rear-guard actions such as voter suppression. The rest of us shouldn’t let the party get away with this deception.

Republished from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Enhanced by Zemanta