Ted Cruz Easily Wins U.S. Senate Race

Photo coutesy of Gage Skidmore

Ted Cruz, a Harvard-educated lawyer and Tea Party icon, easily won the U.S. Senate race Tuesday night, becoming the first Hispanic from Texas to land the job.

Cruz had a huge, insurmountable lead in early returns. In early statewide returns, his total was slightly behind Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney‘s total, but the gap represented a relatively low number of split ballots. Romney was beating President Obama by more than 15 points with about 85 percent of the precincts reporting, according to early unofficial returns.

The outcome of the U.S. Senate race was never much in doubt. Democrats haven’t won statewide in Texas since 1994, and Democrat Paul Sadler had so little money — about 5 percent of what Cruz raised — that he couldn’t even afford to run a single TV ad hitting all media markets.

Sadler conceded before 9 p.m. in a brief address to supporters. At that point Cruz was winning 57 percent to 40 percent.

“I’m proud to stand in front of you and say we have a new senator-elect named Ted Cruz,” Sadler said. “I want us to be proud in our response to the voters’ choices.”

About a half hour later, Cruz took to the podium at a jubilant victory celebration in Houston. He said he had gotten a “gracious” phone call from Sadler and told the cheering crowd he was the next senator from Texas.

“What a journey we have been on together. What an incredible, magical journey,” Cruz said. “They said it was impossible. They said it couldn’t be done, but when the people stand together nothing is impossible.”

Cruz, a domestic policy adviser on George W. Bush’s 2000 presidential campaign and solicitor general of Texas from 2003 to 2008, is considered a brilliant legal scholar. But this will be his first job in elective office.

The son of a Cuban immigrant, Cruz was considered a long shot when he got into a crowded Republican primary that included the deep-pocketed Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst.

Cruz began that race on a shoestring budget and focused for months on building relationships among a far-flung network of Tea Party activists who came to make up the campaign’s most die-hard supporters. They relied largely on social media and candidate forums to spread their message, hoarding their campaign money for TV ads they knew they could not run until the final few weeks of the race.

Cruz’s defeat of Dewhurst in the July 31 runoff shocked the political establishment and set the stage for Cruz’s easy victory Tuesday night.

Sadler’s runoff with political novice Grady Yarbrough drew little interest by comparison, and only a fraction of the millions showered on the Republican primary.

A former state representative from East Texas, Sadler attempted to portray Cruz as an extremist who was out of step with mainstream Texas, even at the risk of coming across as strident and angry. In one Texas Tribune interview, Sadler took issue with Cruz’s Canadian birth and his ties to Washington, saying, “He needs to go back to Washington where he’s from, or Canada, because he doesn’t reflect us.” Later, in a debate, Sadler called Cruz a “troll,” a comment he later said he regretted making. 

But Sadler, like a trail of Democrats before him, got almost no traction in the electorate and even less among donors. The latest campaign finance reports show the Democratic lawyer raised $600,000, compared with some $14 million raised by Cruz.

Cruz will join a growing cadre of Tea Party Republicans who are determined to scale back the size of government and reduce the debt. Drawing on lines from his stump speech, Cruz warned that the United States was going down the road of “European socialism,” and he promised to do everything he can to stop it.

Cruz vowed to fight President Obama unless he changed his ways.

“If he is re-elected and intends to continue down this same path, then I will spend every waking moment to led the fight to stop it,” Cruz said.

Texas Tribune donors or members may be quoted or mentioned in our stories, or may be the subject of them. For a complete list of contributors, click here.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at http://www.texastribune.org/texas-politics/2012-congressional-election/cruz-easily-wins-us-senate-race/.

Enhanced by Zemanta

How Ted Cruz Did It

Photo courtesy of Gage Skidmore

Tea party insurgent Ted Cruz‘s thrilling and improbable victory over Texas Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst in Texas’s GOP Senate primary provides a model for future long-shot candidates to follow, though repeating what Cruz did will be difficult.

A long line of dominoes had to fall, in the precise order that they did, for Cruz to overcome an opponent who had every advantage a political candidate can have.

Dewhurst had unlimited financing (he spent at least $19.9 million of his own money), universal name recognition, unanimous support from the Austin political establishment and massive political power as the leader of the Texas Senate.

Ted Cruz had courage, wisdom and a hunch.

When Cruz’s eventual campaign manager told me in early 2011 that the former Texas solicitor general would likely run for retiring U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison‘s Senate seat, I scoffed at the idea. The race was beyond his reach, he couldn’t raise enough money, he had never been on the ballot before, other likely candidates possessed statewide name recognition and Cruz’s Hispanic surname would hurt him in a Republican primary.

But Cruz and his team were undeterred by the naysayers. They went to work.

In Texas, if a primary candidate wins less than 50 percent of the vote, the top two primary candidates advance to a runoff. Cruz’s biggest insight was that he could win a runoff against Dewhurst; the hard part would be making it to the runoff.

Cruz set out to build the largest grassroots army in Texas history, believing that passionate supporters would act as force multipliers.

But first he needed help.

In politics, the shape of the field determines the race. Cruz needed to become the consensus conservative candidate in order to make it a one-on-one race against Dewhurst, so he could nationalize the campaign. When it began, four candidates sought the conservative mantle: Cruz, Railroad Commissioners Michael Williams and Elizabeth Ames Jones and former Secretary of State Roger Williams. Cruz came out ahead by outworking and outperforming his competition.

Early on, Cruz won the support of the Club for Growth and FreedomWorks (and later the Tea Party Express), whose outside efforts would prove critical later. He unexpectedly raised significant money (about $1 million every three months), a task made more difficult by the large, unsettled field.

Conservatives gradually lined up behind Cruz, giving him momentum and forcing the other conservative candidates to drop out. By the filing deadline, Cruz was the only tea party candidate in the race.

Traditionally, Texas has March primaries. But wrangling and a court battle over the state’s redistricting map forced election officials to move the primary to late May, with a runoff in the dog days of summer in late July, ultimately reducing turnout and giving Cruz more time to raise money and build momentum.

And Cruz’s momentum kept building. National Review put him on its cover, just as it had put Marco Rubio on its cover two years before. Syndicated columnist George Will wrote a glowing column in which he described Cruz as a candidate who was “as good as it gets.”

The five strongest conservatives in the U.S. Senate — Jim DeMint, Rand Paul, Mike Lee, Pat Toomey and Tom Coburn — all endorsed him. Talk radio followed, with Mark Levin, Glenn Beck and eventually Sean Hannity endorsing Cruz.

This momentum forced two other potential candidates — Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX) and State Senator Dan Patrick — not to run, keeping Cruz as the only movement conservative in the field.

But there may have never been a runoff between Cruz and Dewhurst were it not for two crucial late developments. Ten days before the runoff, Ron Paul endorsed Cruz, which brought Paul’s supporters into the fold. Then former Governor Sarah Palin (R-AK) endorsed him, bringing in a wave of invaluable earned media, small donor contributions and momentum. Those endorsements helped Cruz get enough votes in the May 29 primary to force a runoff. At that point, the race’s ultimate result was inevitable.

Two months later, on runoff election night, Cruz’s rabid volunteer base, outside support and huge momentum carried him to a crushing 13-point win.

Cruz is a once-in-a-generation candidate who ran a nearly flawless campaign in a favorable political environment. But he never should have been able to win. Indeed, as he has said to his supporters, “I alone could not win this race. But with your help, we could not lose.”

Enhanced by Zemanta

Palin Jabs at Perry While Rallying for Cruz

Sarah Palin and her husband, Todd Palin, stopped by Chick-fil-A in The Woodlands after Friday's rally. Photo courtesy of Sarah Palin / Facebook.

Standing on a stage in the middle of a park facing a crowd of more than a thousand supporters of former Texas Solicitor General Ted Cruz, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin smiled and pointed at the black boots on her feet.

“You know who gave me these boots?” she asked sweetly. “Your governor.”

The crowd cheered. Then Palin delivered the punch line.

“At least in that one case he made a good decision,” she said.

It was the most overt reference to what has emerged as the dividing line in this intense July 31 Republican runoff to replace U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, who is retiring.

A large swath of Republican leaders in state government are backing Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst, while a bevy of the country’s most well-known conservatives are rallying around Cruz.

The two factions have traditionally been on the same side. Palin even spoke at a similar rally in favor of Gov. Rick Perry’s re-election bid in 2010.

Now members from each side are openly dismissing each other as politically irrelevant in Texas.

Sarah Palin's gift from Rick Perry. Photo courtesy of Dr. Melissa Clouthier via Twitter.

As the laughter subsided, Palin qualified her jab at Perry, who is backing Dewhurst, by adding, “We’ll be a team after this is all over again.”

Other speakers at the rally reinforced the notion, insinuated by Palin, that those opposed to a Cruz victory in the runoff were also at odds with the Tea Party movement as a whole.

U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint, a South Carolina Republican and a Tea Party favorite, listed Senate race upsets of the past two years, including the victories of Pat Toomey in Pennsylvania, Rand Paul in Kentucky and Marco Rubio in Florida.

“We the people have taken back our government and you’re seeing it in this election too. … The establishment picked their candidate — Austin, Washington. It was a done deal,” said DeMint, who predicted a “landslide victory” for Cruz that could only have happened under “the new political reality.”

Cruz spent most of his speech criticizing President Barack Obama but briefly referenced Dewhurst.

“My opponent thinks a big, big checkbook can buy this race,” Cruz said. “Let me tell you, nobody is going to buy this U.S. Senate seat. This race has been a testament to the power of grassroots.”

Hours before the rally, the Dewhurst campaign released an endorsement letter signed by 18 of the Texas Senate’s 19 Republican members. The letter described Dewhurst as “the right conservative to bring the Texas model to Washington, and get America back to work.” The campaign also released a new web video called “Welcome to Texas” that highlights Dewhurst’s record, and spokesman Enrique Marquez issued a statement accusing “Washington insiders” of coming to Texas to “rewrite Texas’ history of conservative values and principles.”

While many attendees at the Cruz rally said they prefer how the Texas government is run compared to the federal government, no endorsement could get them to strongly link Dewhurst to the state’s success.

David Maudlin, from the town of Cut and Shoot, called Texas “a solid state” but remained suspect of Dewhurst’s role in keeping it that way.

“I think he’s been in a good position to take credit, but he hasn’t really effected the change,” Maudlin said.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at http://www.texastribune.org/texas-people/ted-cruz/palin-jabs-perry-while-rallying-cruz/.

Texas Tribune donors or members may be quoted or mentioned in our stories, or may be the subject of them. For a complete list of contributors, click here.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Competitive Senate Race Draws to a Close

Photo courtesy of Bob Daemmrich

What has become a battle was supposed to be more of a coronation for Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst, who has run the Texas Senate for the last decade. He has a vast personal fortune to spend on the race. And he was the favorite of just about every establishment Republican in the state, including Gov. Rick Perry.

“David’s the one candidate best prepared to make conservative change happen in Washington,” Perry said in an ad for Dewhurst. “Don’t let anyone tell you different.”

Audio: Ben Philpott’s story for KUT News

Even Dewhurst’s opponent, Ted Cruz, the former state solicitor general, will tell you that when he entered the race, it was Dewhurst and the eight other guys.

“You know, when we started this campaign a year and a half ago, there wasn’t anybody in the state that thought I had a prayer,” Cruz said. “I was at 2 percent in the polls, and the margin of error was 3 percent.”

And many believe that if the election had been held in March — Texas’ traditional primary month — Dewhurst would have easily gotten the 50 percent needed to win the GOP primary without a runoff. But thanks to a lawsuit over legislative redistricting, the primary was pushed back to late May. Republican strategist Ted Delisi said that changed the race.

“I think there was always a potential for a competitive race,” Delisi said. “But it has become very competitive. And the reason for that is, the non-Dewhurst candidates, and in this case Ted Cruz, have had the time to make their case.”

There was time for Cruz to meet more voters and time to build his name recognition across the state. Will Lutz, former editor of a prominent Texas conservative newsletter, said Cruz used his time doing the equivalent of walking door to door to meet voters.

“What Ted Cruz did is for the past year and a half at least, he’s been going to every conservative Republican group that would listen to him,” Lutz said. “He’s got a stump speech that those audiences find attractive.”

So bit by bit, Cruz moved up in the polls. In a crowded primary, he was able to solidify the anti-Dewhurst vote. Then came a late endorsement from Tea Party favorite Sarah Palin. And finally, he got a couple million dollars in ads from the Washington, D.C.-based conservative group Club for Growth.

“Dewhurst backed wasteful earmarks and pushed for new wage taxes and a statewide property tax,” a Cruz ad says. “Big-spending, tax-raising David Dewhurst: wrong for Texas.”

That ad support, coupled with Cruz’s emphasis on reaching out to conservative bloggers across the country, gave him national attention. Lutz said that dramatically affected Cruz’s fundraising efforts.

“You will see people from all over the country giving money to Ted Cruz,” Lutz said. “He has made a splash in national conservative circles. Being on the cover of National Review magazine, which is a conservative commentary publication, is a real coup for somebody running for office in one state.”

All that — the money, the endorsements and the extra time to campaign — led to a second-place finish in the May primary. He only got 34 percent of the vote, but his supporters are mostly from the grassroots/activist/Tea Party branch of the GOP. And neither rain nor sleet nor July Texas heat will keep those voters from the polls. The Dewhurst campaign has failed to generate the same emotional fire, which leaves him hoping his supporters won’t skip the runoff.

“We have polled and polled, and there are substantially more David Dewhurst voters in Texas that we’ve been able to identify then Ted Cruz voters,” Dewhurst said. “But again, it’s a question of turnout.”

Recent polls show the race is a dead heat, which has led to a bloody July on TV. The Club for Growth has hammered away at Dewhurst, calling him a moderate who wants to raise taxes. Dewhurst paints Cruz as a D.C. insider, a corrupt lawyer and someone who can only talk about what he’d do in office, whereas Dewhurst has a record of already doing it.

“I have cut spending,” Dewhurst said. “I have cut taxes. I have balanced budgets. I have fought against ‘Obamacare.’ I have fought to secure our borders. I am the only literal fighter. Being in the debate club is not a fighter.”

Cruz is ending his campaign by doubling down on his Tea Party support. Tonight in The Woodlands, Palin and the Tea Party Express are hosting a rally and fundraiser on his behalf.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at http://www.texastribune.org/texas-politics/2012-congressional-election/competitive-senate-race-draws-close/.

Texas Tribune donors or members may be quoted or mentioned in our stories, or may be the subject of them. For a complete list of contributors, click here.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Dewhurst Drops Restraint Over Stints in Air Force, CIA

Photo illustration courtesy of Todd Wiseman, The Texas Tribune

Before he was a wealthy businessman and the lieutenant governor of Texas, David Dewhurst was a member of the U.S. Air Force and the CIA.

For years, Dewhurst didn’t discuss that time in his life very often, preferring to stress his success in the private sector and as an elected official in Texas.

Yet in recent weeks, Dewhurst has repeatedly pointed to his stints in the military and the CIA to draw a contrast between himself and his opponent in a July 31 Republican primary runoff, former Texas Solicitor General Ted Cruz.

“Four times in my life, I have raised my right hand: when I joined the United States Air Force, when I went into the CIA and twice in state government,” Dewhurst said during Monday’s televised debate in Houston. “I took a solemn oath to defend the Constitution and U.S. law against all enemies both foreign and domestic.”

A day later, at a press conference with Gov. Rick Perry, he noted that service in the military was something he and Perry shared.

“I volunteered to go into the United States Air Force during the Vietnam War, just like Gov. Perry did,” Dewhurst said. “And after that, I volunteered again, and went into the CIA and I served abroad in harm’s way.”

Fresh out of college, Dewhurst enlisted in the Air Force in 1967 with the hope of emulating his father, a World War II air force pilot who flew 85 missions. His father died at the hands of a drunk driver when Dewhurst was 3 years old.

Dewhurst’s eyesight didn’t meet the Air Force’s minimum standards for pilots, so he was first assigned to Plattsburgh, N.Y., helping guarding B-52 bombers loaded with nuclear weapons, according to a 2002 Texas Monthly profile. He eventually became an intelligence officer with the rank of first lieutenant, according to military records.

In 1970, at the age of 26, Dewhurst left the Air Force and joined the CIA. He learned about the agency through a father of a college roommate who worked there, he told Austin’s KXAN-TV last year. He said the CIA first talked with him about joining the agency during that time.

Dewhurst worked at the U.S. embassy in La Paz, Bolivia, but has said that his work for the State Department there was a cover.

“I had a full-time embassy job,” he told Texas Monthly. “After hours and on weekends I was tasked by my [CIA] boss in Washington to keep in touch with certain groups and foreign embassies and opinion makers that Washington was interested in.”

The timing of his Bolivian stint provided fodder for critics when Dewhurst ran for land commissioner in 1998. Bolivia’s elected government was overthrown in a bloody coup in 1971, which the U.S. government was accused of helping arrange. Dewhurst has insisted he had nothing to do with the regime change.

“I left Bolivia in 1973,” he told the Austin Chronicle in 2001. “I have no informed opinion of President Banzer’s [administration], other than that during the late 1970s, the U.S. State Department and international banking interests applauded Bolivia’s strengthening economy. That apparent accomplishment has been clouded by numerous and repeated allegations of human rights violations.”

In the 1998 race for land commissioner, state Rep. Richard Raymond, Dewhurst’s Democratic opponent, described him as a former “spy.” Dewhurst disputed that characterization at the time.

“Using official language,” Dewhurst told the Washington Times, “your traditional CIA officer is a case officer and he talks to different sources. You might call them spies. Kind of like a reporter.”

Dewhurst reportedly left the CIA in 1974. Twenty years later, Congress created a blue-ribbon committee to look into how to reform the country’s intelligence committees. Dewhurst, by then head of his own energy and investment firm in Houston, was appointed to the committee by Sen. Bob Dole, a Kansas Republican.

President George H.W. Bush, a former director of the CIA, recommended Dewhurst for the position in a letter to Dole.

“David, as you will see from the enclosed letter and resume, knows the CIA from the inside,” Bush wrote. “He is now a successful businessman.”

At a 1996 press conference on the release of the commission’s report, Dewhurst spoke about the importance of sending a message to the country’s intelligence agents that their work was still valued.

“More people died in Oklahoma City than died in Desert Storm,” Dewhurst said. “It’s a very dangerous world, and most Americans in this political season seem to be thinking in terms of family and jobs, but they wouldn’t be thinking in terms of family and jobs if our intelligence agencies weren’t working as hard as they are on a daily basis.”

Dewhurst expressed a similar sentiment at Monday’s debate, advocating for Texans to send to Washington “a strong senator who understands the military, who understands the intelligence business.”

John Wayne Ferguson and Jay Root contributed to this report.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at http://www.texastribune.org/texas-people/david-dewhurst/dewhurst-pointing-more-stints-air-force-and-cia/.

Texas Tribune donors or members may be quoted or mentioned in our stories, or may be the subject of them. For a complete list of contributors, click here.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Rick Perry Makes “Final Pitch” for David Dewhurst

Photo courtesy of Gage Skidmore

Gov. Rick Perry made one last push ahead of the July 31 runoff for Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst on Tuesday afternoon, joining the GOP U.S. Senate hopeful at a news conference and describing former Texas Solicitor General Ted Cruz as having “no record.”

Speaking at the headquarters of a digital imaging company in Houston a day after the last televised debate of the race, Perry and Dewhurst touted the state’s economic success as good reason for voters to select Dewhurst to replace U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, who is retiring.

“I’m not a candidate, just another voter right now,” Perry said. “So one voter to another, I thought I’d make one final pitch to the people of the state of Texas to support my friend, my partner and a great conservative leader in Texas, David Dewhurst.”

Perry made a point to hit back against comments made by Cruz and his supporters that conservative measures passed by the Legislature in recent years happened in spite of Dewhurst’s leadership or even over Dewhurst’s objections, rather than as a result of Dewhurst’s efforts. Perry described Dewhurst as a “faithful, loyal conservative partner.”

Perry never mentioned Cruz by name, but he made clear how little he thought of Cruz’s resume.

“The idea we’re going to send someone without a record, in the case of his opponent, versus someone who has a record, to me this is pretty easy,” Perry said. “This is a proven fiscal conservative, social conservative par excellence.”

When asked if the runoff was also a referendum on Perry’s record, Perry declined to answer, instead describing the race as “a referendum on how an outside group has come into Texas with no regard to the state.”

Repeating a charge he first made Monday in Austin, Perry accused the Washington, D.C.-based Club for Growth, a group that has spent millions supporting Cruz, of backing Cruz because they want to see U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint of South Carolina move up in the Senate Republican leadership over U.S. Sen. John Cornyn of Texas. Dewhurst has said he would support Cornyn in such an election. Cruz has said declaring who he would support before joining the Senate would be “presumptuous.”

“It is clear to me that Club for Growth has a substantial more interest in who’s going to be the leader in the Senate, whether it’s the whip or the majority leader, etc., than they are in how Texas is doing,” Perry said.

Perry and Dewhurst appeared chummy with one another throughout the event. At one point, Dewhurst described himself as “the most conservative lieutenant governor in the history of the state of Texas,” then looked at Perry and added, “with the possible exception of …”

“I was only there for a year,” Perry said with a wave of his hand. “I’ll give you that title.”

Immediately after the news conference, the Dewhurst campaign posted its latest TV ad online, an edited version of one used during the primary featuring Perry praising Dewhurst’s conservative record.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at http://www.texastribune.org/texas-people/rick-perry/perry-makes-final-pitch-dewhurst/.

Texas Tribune donors or members may be quoted or mentioned in our stories, or may be the subject of them. For a complete list of contributors, click here.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Cruz and Dewhurst Lay Off Attacks At Tea Party Forum

Photo courtesy of Gage Skidmore

Though their race that has turned increasingly negative in recent weeks, the two Republicans in a primary runoff for Texas’ open U.S. Senate seat kept things fairly friendly at a candidate forum on Saturday night.

The more than 200 attendees of the Fort Bend County Tea Party event appeared to appreciate the change in tone, as both Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst and former Texas Solicitor General Ted Cruz repeatedly drew loud applause.

The two candidates took turns answering the same set of questions. Dewhurst went first and Cruz waited outside so he couldn’t hear the questions in advance, organizers said.

On every question of policy, their answers were virtually identical.

Is the country’s southern border a national security issue or a law enforcement issue? Both, they each said, before adding that they supported tripling the size of the border patrol.

When asked if they thought it was appropriate for the president to have a “personal kill list,” both said it was not, but Cruz got a big laugh when he said, “Well number one, I’m worried all of us are on it.”

“Even though one couldn’t hear the other one, they actually said a lot of the same kind of thing,” said Ed Svoboda, a board member with the Fort Bend County Tea Party. “They really mirrored each other.”

Perhaps the most revealing part of the forum was the contrast in the candidates’ responses to a question on whether they viewed themselves as a “Tea Party candidate.”

Dewhurst, staring at a crowd in which far more buttons and signs sported Cruz’s name than his own, acknowledged that many of those there were backing his opponent.

“I think that’s wonderful. That’s fine,” Dewhurst said. “I’m here to talk to you as David Dewhurst. I hope at the end, a couple of you all walk away saying ‘Huh, let me learn more about this guy.’”

He then said he was aligned with all the issues of the Tea Party.

When the question was posed to Cruz, the crowd laughed loudly, as if the answer was obvious. Cruz grinned.

“Yes and hell yes,” he said, eliciting cheers.

He then alluded to his longstanding criticism of Dewhurst for not showing up at dozens of Tea Party events over the last year in which all of the Republican candidates in the race were invited.

“How do you build Tea Party support? You go and listen to people and answer their questions. You don’t cut a deal in the backrooms of Austin,” Cruz said.

While both candidates’ remarks hewed closely to speeches they have delivered repeatedly on the campaign trail, Dewhurst closed out his appearance with a variation on his usual request for support in the runoff.

After talking about his father, a World War II pilot who was killed by a drunk driver when Dewhurst was 3 years old, he said: “My dad never made his 86th mission. He was fighting for the freedom of the world. … For the last four years, we’ve had freedoms taken away from us. It’s time to restore those freedoms. I’d like one more mission. Mission 86. Will you join me? Let’s go.”

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at http://www.texastribune.org/texas-politics/2012-congressional-election/tea-party-forum-cruz-and-dewhurst-lay-attacks/. Texas Tribune donors or members may be quoted or mentioned in our stories, or may be the subject of them. For a complete list of contributors, click here.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Cruz, Dewhurst Face Off in Senate Debate

Photo courtesy of iStockphoto

In their first televised debate of the Republican primary runoff, both Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst and former Texas Solicitor General Ted Cruz stuck to the scripts they had honed throughout the primary.

The two candidates sparred for one hour before an audience of Republican voters at the studios of KERA, the Dallas public television affiliate. The Texas Tribune was a partner in the debate. KERA Managing Editor Shelley Kofler was the moderator.

Dewhurst spent much of the hour claiming credit for the strong Texas economy and any conservative legislation passed by the Legislature since he became Lieutenant Governor in 2003.

Cruz repeatedly pointed to politically charged lawsuits that he had worked on, usually as the state’s Solicitor General, as proof that he will fight harder than Dewhurst for conservative principles in the U.S. Senate.

Throughout the night, Cruz attacked Dewhurst’s record, accusing him of increasing spending and too often working with Democrats. He also gave Dewhurst all the blame for bills sought by conservatives that have not passed in Texas including a repeal of the program that gives in-state tuition rates to some illegal immigrants.

Though Dewhurst’s campaign released an ad earlier in the day attacking Cruz’s work as an appellate lawyer for a Chinese tire manufacturer, he largely avoided touching on Cruz’s record during the debate.

The candidates agreed more often than not when it came to policy issues that could actually come up in the U.S. Senate.

Though nine Republicans were on the ballot during last month’s primary, the race has been largely focused on Dewhurst and Cruz for months. Dewhurst, who has been in office in Texas for more than a decade and has millions of dollars in personal wealth at his disposal, has long been seen as the man to beat. His supporters include Gov. Rick Perry and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee.

But Cruz has a strong following among Tea Party supporters, who think he represents the future of the GOP. And he has drawn national attention from well-known conservatives including U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Lake Jackson, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania.

 

LIVEBLOG

 

8:01 p.m. Debate starting now.
8:02 p.m. The debate will be moderated by KERA Managing Editor Shelley Kofler.  Most of the questions will come from a panel of journalists consisting of Ross Ramsey, executive editor of the Texas Tribune Crystal Ayala, political reporter for Univision Texas and Peggy Fikac, Austin bureau chief for the San Antonio Express-Newsand Houston Chronicle.

Some questions are also going to come from a small audience of Republicans voters.

8:08 p.m. The first question is on immigration. Peggy Fikac asks whether the candidates support a guest worker program and what they would do about the millions of illegal immigrants already in the country.

Cruz and Dewhurst both say they oppose a guest worker program. Neither give a direct answer on whether they would deport illegal immigrants already in the country.

8:11 p.m. Responding to a question from Ross Ramsey, both candidates say the government should not have bailed out General Motors. Ramsey then asked about the jobs in GM’s Arlington plant that may have been lost without a bailout.

“At the end of the day, we don’t know what jobs would or wouldn’t have been lost…That sort of question always assumes that the money from the govt comes form nowhere,” Cruz said.

Dewhurst spoke about the need to bring “the Texas model” to Washingtonn, D.C.

8:17 p.m. Cruz criticizes Dewhurst’s fiscal record as Lieutenant Governor. He says “Taxes have gone up 49 percent” under Dewhurst and state spending has gone up faster than the combined rate of population growth plus inflation.

Dewhurst appears ready for that attack.

” I love the math. I love the math. Thank you for saying that,” Dewhurst says. He notes that the Club for Growth, an ardent Cruz backer in the race, recently praised Texas’ tax structure as “exemplary and its conservative record on state spending.

“It’s a fact,” Dewhurst said. “Facts are stubborn, my friend.”

8:24 p.m. A question on integrity prompts both candidates to criticize each other for running attack ads.

Cruz accused Dewhurst of spending over $10 million to run false “nasty” ads about him.

Dewhurst noted that “Washington insiders” are spending millions saying “untrue things about me” on behalf of Cruz.

8:28 p.m. Each candidate just got a chance to ask each other a question.

Cruz asks Dewhurst about a payroll tax.

“So I have a very simple question: did you support a payroll tax. Yes or no and is that a good idea?”

“I’ve never supported a payroll tax and I’ve never supported a wage tax,” Dewhurst told him.

Dewhurst used his turn to give a brief summary of Cruz’s biography and contrast it with Dewhurst’s background.

“What about your background do you think makes you more qualified to be the next U.S. Senator?” Dewhurst asked.

Cruz began by saying he salutes Dewhurst’s in the military and the CIA. He then spoke about his own record fighting politically-charged cases in federal courts, most of them while Solicitor General of Texas.

“We need a fighter right now and that’s what I’ve spent a lifetime doing in defending the constitution,” Cruz said.

8:38 p.m. The candidates largely agree on two questions on energy.

The first question, from a member of the audience, was about  the country’s energy supply and the impact of EPA regulation.

Both candidates were quick to criticize the EPA and praise the opportunity of exploiting the natural gas underneath Texas.

“We need to be using that natural gas,” Dewhurst said. “We need to expand drilling…use it in electric generation and this will dramatically benefit the economy of Texas and reduce emissions.”

Cruz agreed but said that’s not surprising given that this debate was taking place in Texas.

“Every candidate for office in Texas says they support oil and gas,” Cruz said. “Unless you are a blithering idiot, that’s the right thing to say.”

He then cited his work fighting the EPA in federal courts.

“We need a fighter who doesn’t just talk but who has walked the walk,” Cruz said.

8:49 p.m. A couple of foreign policy questions may have uneasrthed a clear policy difference between the candidates.

Ramsey asked the candidates about whether the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were a mistake and whether they would support cutting defense spending to help balance the overall budget.

Regarding the two wars, Cruz said, “I think they made sense to go in and we stayed there for too long.” He said he would not cut defense spending to balance the budget.

Dewhurst said he thought the country went into both wars for the right reasons.

Regarding Iraq, “I think the Obama administration…so anxious to cut and run, should have left some troops there to be able to train the Iraqi forces,” Dewhurst said.

Dewhurst said funding the military was vital but that finding savings were possible. He pointed to expensive weapons system that end up getting loaded with “earmarks” by members of Congress.

“We can save money and deliver our weapons to the warriors in the field faster,” Dewhurst said.

8:54 p.m. Both candidates were asked about the TSA policy of screening passengers in a way that many have described as groping.

“I strongly oppose the TSA’s policy of groping innocent civilians,” Cruz said. He praised Israel’s approach of “targeting terrorists” to protect its air travel and said America was “too politically correct” to follow such a policy.

He accused Dewhurst of backing down on a TSA bill that came before the Texas Senate last year.

“The truth is I’m opposed by groping by the TSA as much as anyone,” Dewhurst said.

He noted that he passed a bill banning TSA groping out of the senate in last year’s special session.

“Let’s eliminate the TSA and privatize it,” Dewhurst said.

8:58 p.m. The candidates were asked about issues in which the two candidates would vote differently in the U.S. Senate.

Dewhurst said he believed Cruz is a conservative and then talked about his approach to “solving problems” before his time ran out.

Cruz attacked the question head-on.

“There will be big differences with respect to spending, with respect to taxes,” Cruz said.

The most glaring difference would be how the two would approach repealing Obamacare, Cruz said.

“Lt. Gov. Dewhurst is a good and decent man who in 15 years in office has been a  conciliator…I will lead the fight to repeal every word of Obamacare.”

9:51 p.m. At press conference after the debate, Cruz claimed that the only reason Gov. Rick Perry is supporting Dewhurst’s bid for U.S. Senate is because Perry wants a different Lieutenant Governor.
“It is in his political interest to get rid of David Dewhurst and get him out of Austin and send him somewhere else,” Cruz said.
Dewhurst left the building after the debate without speaking to the press.

Texas Tribune donors or members may be quoted or mentioned in our stories, or may be the subject of them. For a complete list of contributors, click here.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at http://www.texastribune.org/texas-politics/2012-congressional-election/liveblog-kera-debate-dewhurst-vs-cruz/.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Ted Cruz and China: What Are the Facts?

Photo illustration by Todd Wiseman

In the hotly contested U.S. Senate race, Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst has suggested that his rival, former Texas Solicitor General Ted Cruz, puts the interests of China above those of the United States.

The allegations stem from Cruz’s legal work for a Chinese company in a patent suit against an American inventor, and his opposition to a trade bill under consideration by the U.S. Congress.

Both sides have accused the other of lying about the case and distorting the facts. On the eve of their first one-one-one debate in Dallas, Dewhurst aired another TV ad about the case, accusing Cruz of misleading voters about his role in it.

The Texas Tribune reviewed the allegations, ads and position papers to get to the bottom of the controversy.

THE FACTS 

In 2006, Jordan Fishman, an American inventor who designs mining tires, discovered that his patented designs had been stolen by an employee and were being used by two international tire distributors, the Al Dobowi Group of Dubai and Shandong Linglong of China.

In October 2009, Fishman filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the two companies in U.S. District Court in Virginia. Fishman won the $26 million suit which led the two companies to appeal the ruling, calling on lawyers from the international firm of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, where Cruz worked as an appellate lawyer, for legal counsel. The appellate court upheld the lower court’s ruling.

THE ATTACKS

In October 2011, Dewhurst supporters sent out an email labeling Cruz “Red Ted” — an insinuation that Cruz had sympathized with Chinese Communists — after a Texas Monthly write-up about his involvement with the patent lawsuit.

The emails followed Cruz’s soundbite-worthy interview with conservative talk show host Laura Ingraham on trade with China. In the interview, Ingraham criticized Cruz for opposing a bill — aimed at cracking down on China — that would impose tariffs on countries that keep their currency artificially low in order to gain a trade advantage. Dewhurst said he supports the legislation. Cruz is siding with both President Obama and presumptive GOP nominee Mitt Romney in opposing the legislation, which has floundered in Congress. Cruz calls it a “protectionist” measure that could spark a dangerous trade war.

In April, Dewhurst published a YouTube video and a website highlighting Cruz’s involvement with the patent lawsuit. Among other things, the Dewhurst camp accused Cruz of being a lead counsel and legal mercenary who helped a “Chinese conglomerate kill American jobs.” They also accused him of stalling the case to stay on the payroll of a Chinese company that was actively infringing patents.

THE COUNTERATTACKS

Cruz responded to the video and website with a point-by-point refutation of the charges, starting with clarifying his role in the suit.

Cruz noted that his firm’s involvement in the case began in appellate court, so neither he nor his firm had a hand in the initial trial. When his firm became involved, Cruz described his role as relatively minor: He says he edited the appellate briefs while the actual appeal was argued by three other lawyers.

Casting the suit as “Chinese vs. American” also skewed the facts, Cruz said. The manufacturing of Fishman’s tire design was coordinated through a Chinese partner business. The stateside jobs that Fishman claimed as casualties to the patent infringement were in sales and distribution. According to Fishman, about 45 jobs were lost as a result of the theft of his blueprints.

ANALYSIS

Cruz, who touts his expertise as an appellate lawyer on the campaign trail, performed legal work for Shandong Linglong and lists the company, as required, as one of his employer’s clients that generated more than $5,000 for the firm. That makes the subject fair game in a political contest that hinges as much on the candidates’ backgrounds as their policy differences.

But the “Red Ted” label, designed to conjure up negative and shady images of Cruz, is a stretch. While Cruz could have refused to work on the case, the notion that doing so makes him a Communist sympathizer is groundless and inflammatory. Dewhurst himself said questioning Cruz’s political allegiance was “ridiculous.”

Cruz’s firm was retained by the company, and Cruz was called on to assist in the case, so the Dewhurst campaign’s description of him as a “legal mercenary” is also off base.

According to Cruz’s personal financial disclosure form, Linglong paid Morgan Lewis more than $5,000. Cruz is not required to disclose how many billable hours he worked on the Fishman case or how much the company paid in total to his law firm in connection with it. He has declined to release that information voluntarily.

The verdict was upheld on appeal, but Cruz was not among the lawyers doing the arguing part of it, and did not appear in court. Dewhurst has referred to Cruz as “lead counsel” in the case. The technical term for Cruz’s role is “counsel of record.” According to legal definitions listed on the Cornell Law School website and others, lawyers who act as counsel of record are responsible for the representation of the client, regardless of whether they ever appear in a courtroom on behalf of that client. In an interview, Cruz said he has never appeared in any courtroom in regard to this case. They are also required to sign legal documents and typically cannot be removed as counsel of record without court action.

The evidence for calling the case a “China vs. America” affair is not clear cut.

Linglong wasn’t involved in the initial conspiracy to undercut Fishman’s business. Sam Vance, one of Fishman’s most trusted American employees, initiated the damage when he encouraged Fishman’s customers to cut Fishman out of the deal and buy straight from the manufacturer (based out of China), according to the lawsuit.

Vance later went on to mastermind the conspiracy to sell the tire blueprints, court documents indicate. When Fishman found out his designs had been stolen and filed suit, Al-Dobowi, the Dubai-based tire distributor, was the most noted defendant, named 172 times in the court document.

In comparison, Linglong was mentioned 49 times — yet was the only conspirator mentioned in the Dewhurst attacks.

Also, Fishman’s lawyer, August Matteis, said he had no evidence that Linglong was connected to the Chinese government. The Dewhurst campaign said Linglong was tied to Communist-led government before market reforms were introduced in the 1970s, and has used those ties to gain unfair trade advantages.

Cruz didn’t play first chair in the appeal of this lawsuit, but he has taken the lead on other international patent infringement cases, successfully arguing a $5 million intellectual theft case before the Supreme Court against a Chinese company last year.

Texas Tribune donors or members may be quoted or mentioned in our stories, or may be the subject of them. For a complete list of contributors, click here.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at http://www.texastribune.org/texas-politics/2012-elections/ted-cruz-and-china-fact-box/.

Enhanced by Zemanta

“Band of Brothers” Pulls Strings for Cruz Campaign

Photo by Bob Daemmrich

The establishment nearly always wins in Texas politics, so Jason Johnson, a longtime Republican consultant, said he thought it would be next to impossible to stop a powerful and wealthy lieutenant governor who would never run out of money or friends.

But when Johnson stumbled into a cab last week during the state Republican convention in Fort Worth, he knew his candidate for the U.S. Senate had crossed a legitimacy threshold he could not have envisioned even a few weeks ago.

The taxi driver, neither a native English speaker nor a political junkie, turned to Johnson and asked him to explain why so many of the passengers he was picking up outside the convention center were wearing the same red lapel sticker and talking about the same guy — Johnson’s client.

“Who is this Ted Cruz?” the cab driver said.

It’s the same question many Texas voters have been asking since Cruz, who has never held elective office, stopped Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst from sewing up the Republican senatorial nomination in a crowded primary late last month. Now the two are facing off in a runoff on July 31, and the notion that an unanointed, movement conservative could beat an Austin powerhouse is sending shockwaves through the state Capitol and beyond.

Whether it was a fluke or the beginning of a monumental upset will not be known for several weeks. In the meantime, observers are trying to figure out how Cruz and his “band of brothers,” as he calls his trusted campaign aides, have become the talk of Austin.

At the center is Johnson, 36, a scrappy East Texas native with a touch of mad genius. Johnson, the son of a coal mine equipment mechanic and a beautician, grew up in a single-wide trailer so dilapidated he could see the ground through a hole in the bathroom floor. Today, he works from an office he had painted black — he said it makes him think better — and by his own count he has won 59 of the 64 campaigns he has run.

Johnson said the Cruz campaign began on a shoestring budget and focused for months on building relationships among a far flung network of Tea Party activists who now make up the campaign’s most die-hard supporters. For months they relied on social media and candidate forums to spread their message, hording their campaign money for TV ads they knew they could not run until the final few weeks of the race.

Campaign manager John Drogin, a former aide to John Cornyn, recalls sleeping on friends’ couches to save money when Cruz visited Washington, D.C.

By the time the convention rolled around last week, about 10 days after the May 29 primary, Cruz received a rock star reception. Dewhurst was booed by the same audience after he criticized Cruz.

“The narrative is he’s this firebrand Tea Party guy, and that fits,” Johnson said of his candidate. “But there’s a broad spectrum of support.”

There is still a long way to go. Dewhurst got more votes than Cruz in the primary, and many pundits say Dewhurst’s institutional support and vast fortune — estimated at $200 million or more — give him the edge.

Dewhurst, one of the most powerful elected leaders in Texas, not only has the endorsement of Gov. Rick Perry, he also hired Perry’s people — Dave Carney, his former campaign consultant, Mike Baselice, his longtime pollster, and Mark Miner, his former top spokesman. Dewhurst has also gotten a major assist from Perry’s former campaign manager, Rob Johnson (no relation to Jason Johnson), now running a well-financed Super PAC supporting the lieutenant governor.

In any other year, that kind of heavy artillery would probably do the trick. But this is not any other year, and the people backing Cruz say he is not any other candidate.

“I have never met a smarter person in my life,” said George Strake, a former state Republican party chairman and former secretary of state. “And Ted Cruz is a fighter down to his toes, to the tip of his hair.”

Cruz, 41, graduated with the highest possible honors from Harvard Law School, he clerked at the Supreme Court for former Chief Justice William Rehnquist and was a domestic policy adviser on George W. Bush’s 2000 presidential campaign. He served as solicitor general of Texas from 2003 to 2008, acting as the chief attorney for the state before appellate courts and the U.S. Supreme Court.

He is the son of a Cuban immigrant, and he has been fascinated by the U.S. Constitution since he was young: He memorized it in high school, and in 1992 he wrote his college thesis on the Constitutional limits of federal power, the 9th and 10th amendments in particular — 18 years before Perry rode a wave of anti-Washington anger to an unprecedented third term as governor.

Conservative intellectuals are now in full swoon. They see in Cruz the makings of another Marco Rubio, the Florida senator said to be on Mitt Romney’s vice-presidential short list. And the Dewhurst-Cruz runoff has become the next stop on an establishment-defeating drive that has visited Republican primaries in Indiana, Nebraska and Utah in recent years.

Carney, the chief strategist for Dewhurst, scoffed at the comparisons. He portrayed Cruz as a “puppet” of the Washington groups that are backing him — like the conservative Club for Growth and FreedomWorks, which have helped defeat incumbents and establishment figures elsewhere. Club for Growth, which spent millions on pro-Cruz TV ads, is promising to spend $5 million more in the runoff.

“I think if you ask Texans today if you want another lawyer or someone with business experience, I think Texans would overwhelmingly say we have enough lawyers in Washington,” Carney said.

In a telephone interview, Cruz called the attack “ludicrous” and began ticking off a list of top conservative leaders in Texas who support him, including some backers of Perry.

Cruz is also firing back at the notion that he is the candidate kowtowing to special interest groups. He said the Dewhurst campaign is run by “political mercenaries” and supported by Austin lobbyists whose livelihoods depend on a good relationship with an elected official who helps shape every major piece of legislation at the state Capitol.

Cruz’s campaign said it has averaged 173 donations a day since the primary. The candidate said he will need the money to counter an onslaught of negative advertising.

“Mark my words,” Cruz said. “By the end of the runoff David Dewhurst will have spent another $10 million of his own money flooding the airwaves with false, nasty attack ads.  It will make the last few weeks of the primary look mild by comparison.”

Texas Tribune donors or members may be quoted or mentioned in our stories, or may be the subject of them. For a complete list of contributors, click here.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at http://www.texastribune.org/texas-politics/2012-elections/band-brothers-pulls-strings-cruz-campaign/.

Enhanced by Zemanta